[Pkg-clamav-devel] licensing/copyright of debian directory

[Stephen Gran]

Hi,

This one time, at band camp, Andreas Cadhalpun said:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On 13.07.2014 21:49, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >On Sunday, July 13, 2014 14:49:12 Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >>I converted clamav's debian/copyright to the DEP-5 format and also
> >>updated it.
> >>
> >>But I don't know what license/copyright should be mentioned for the
> >>debian directory. (Only the clamav-config.1 man page has an explicit
> >>license.)
> >>
> >>What do you think?
> >
> >I would view it as under the same license as the predominate license of the
> >package, but sgran is probably the one that should say since it's mostly his
> >work.
> 
> Do you concur with Scott's view, or should debian/copyright mention
> a different license (than GPL-2) for the debian directory (like
> GPL-2+, under which you licensed the clamav-config.1 man page)?

I have no strong preference.  GPL-2 is fine with me, but if you are
inclined towards GPL-2+, that's also ok.

Cheers,
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran at debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20140717/820e9870/attachment.sig>