[Pkg-clamav-devel] build clamav with system LLVM

[Scott Kitterman]

On May 6, 2014 3:17:01 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhalpun at googlemail.com> wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>On 04.05.2014 20:31, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On May 4, 2014 2:07:11 PM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun
><andreas.cadhalpun at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 04.05.2014 17:26, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>>> On May 4, 2014 5:44:47 AM EDT, Andreas Cadhalpun
>>> <andreas.cadhalpun at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 03.05.2014 01:05, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>>>> I'm not familiar with the different *bsd's, but I guess that
>kfreebsd
>>>>> is not that different from freebsd, so we could try to enable JIT
>on
>>>>> kfreebsd by adding it to that list.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's your opinion?
>>>>
>>>> In general, I'm in favor.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>
>> Right. Got confused. Let's try it.  I can access porter boxes to
>test.
>
>I have installed Debian/kfreebsd-amd64 (jessie) in a VirtualBox.
>Then I built clamav with the following change on top of the aca_llvm
>branch:
>--- a/libclamav/c++/configure.ac
>+++ b/libclamav/c++/configure.ac
>@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ if test "$enable_llvm" = "auto"; then
>      case "$target_cpu" in
>         i?86|amd64|x86_64|powerpc*)
>             case "$target_os" in
>- 
>darwin*|freebsd*|openbsd*|netbsd*|dragonfly*|linux*|solaris*|win32*|mingw*)
>+ 
>darwin*|freebsd*|kfreebsd*|openbsd*|netbsd*|dragonfly*|linux*|solaris*|win32*|mingw*)
>                     AC_MSG_RESULT([ok ($target_cpu-$target_os)])
>                     ;;
>                 *)
>
>It built successfully, so I think this can be enabled.
>
>What do you think about merging aca_llvm to unstable now?
>
>It would probably make sense to upload these changes together with the 
>new upstream version 0.98.2.

Agreed.   

Make sure to adjust debian rules and control. 

Scott K