[Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#785130: (no subject)

[Felix Defrance]

Hi Paul, Brent,

It's hard to known witch is the right way to do.

@Paul, you say you are unimpressed by the work of extremshok. Can you
explain why ? Is the work isn't trustable ?

@Brent your packging seems missing somethings like the location of the
debian sources as I see. The VCS not pointing on salsa.debian.org and no
source to building the package is provided on github... Maybe you could
improve that by relocate your work on salsa ;)
On the other hand, if you want to get sponsor, you could solve lintian
warnings too. Ask help to the mentors

I'm not debian packaging expert, but I hope the subject will be
clarified, I'm clamav user, and I would like  to know if it's better to
purge or upgrade clamav-unofficial-sigs

Thanks

-- 
Félix Defrance
PGP: 0x46A603D10F04DC57


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20190131/31158765/attachment.sig>