[Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: Bug#1006179: ClamAV 1.0.0 release candidate now available

Scott Kitterman debian at kitterman.com
Sat Dec 31 00:11:45 GMT 2022



On December 30, 2022 11:44:39 PM UTC, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian at breakpoint.cc> wrote:
>On 2022-12-30 16:22:21 [-0500], Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Great.  I finished the changes for the embedded crates (it's not perfect 
>> machine readable copyright format, but it's close and I think it will do for 
>> the moment) and pushed the change.  It should be a fast forward for you when 
>> you pull it.
>
>did it.
>
>> I think the short d/rules file that I sent you earlier has the ~correct build 
>> options for us, so don't redo that if you don't have to. 
>
>just updated it with your input.
>
>> I'll be around this weekend, so if you upload it, I should be able to check it 
>> through New.  I'll send an email to the release team warning them about our 
>> need for an upcoming transition slot.
>> 
>> Anything else I can help with?
>
>I got a few steps further instead going to bed. It complains now about
>missing testfiles because they are no longer shipped. So either we need
>to tweak it or we just drop that package.
>Other than that we would need to test or just throw it to exp asap and
>sort the pieces later. So I think we need to figure out if we keep
>`clamav-testfiles' and manually move the files or drop it (and maybe
>introduce it later again if people complain).
>
>> Scott K
>
>Sebastian

I think if there's a reasonable way to keep it, we should.  In general though, I think uploading to experimental sooner rather than later is the right way to go, but if you drop the testfiles package now, it'll end up in New again when we put it back (people do use it, so I'm confident we'll get complaints if we drop it).

Scott K

Scott K



More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list