Package for libquoin-clojure

Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza eugeniocanom at
Wed May 15 16:35:37 UTC 2013


My apologies for the confusion regarding the naming. My intention was to
use libUPSTREAMNAME-clojure since robert-hooke is set that way if I'm not
mistaken. I am however clumsy and didn't change the names properly. I'm
fine with UPSTREAMNAME-clojure, we can do that then.

I do have an upstream branch for quoin (but not for scout =S), I think I
didn't git-import-orig properly. Thank you for the documentation, I'll give
it a look right away so I can repack quoin and scout.


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Wolodja Wentland <debian at>wrote:

> Hi Eugenio,
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 20:10 +0200, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza wrote:
> > I just finished making the package for quoin (the last dependency for
> stencil).
> > I also fixed a couple of things with scout (uploaded tags and some
> more), I
> > also set my git name properly.
> I just wanted to take a look at the packages you prepared and have a
> couple of
> questions:
>     * Could it be that you did not push all branches to I
> seem
>       to be missing pristine-tar and upstream.
>       See for a short overview of how
> the
>       Java team handles this
>     * Your naming convention is unclear to me and I would strongly prefer
> if
>       we could adhere to a single one. I see the following git repositories
>       which do not seem to match the name of the source packages:
>         - libquoin-clojure while the source package is called "quoin"
>         - scout which matches the name of the source package
> In the light of my experiences with slingshot I guess it would make sense
> to
> adhere to a naming scheme like:
>     UPSTREAMNAME-clojure
> which gives us
>     quoin-clojure
>     scout-clojure
>     ...
> But simply using UPSTREAMNAME alone is totally okay as long as that name
> has
> not yet been claimed. What I do want though is that the name of the git
> repository matches the name of the source package. You can probably
> convince
> me of another naming scheme though ... So speak now!
> I'll review the other packages once I can build them, so please let me know
> how to achieve that or push the missing branches :)
> --
> Wolodja <debian at>
> 4096R/CAF14EFC
> 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-clojure-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-clojure-maintainers at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Pkg-clojure-maintainers mailing list