naming scheme

[Paul Tagliamonte]

On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:06:31PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 01:22:29PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Some of the packages are:
> > 
> >    libfoo-clojure   ( like Perl )
> > 
> > I would, however, prefer the Python-style:
> > 
> >    clojure-foo
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> I have no strong opinions on that but always liked the Perl style
> since it was easy to find libraries ("^lib.+-clojure$"). To me,
> libclj-time-clojure does not look weirder than clojure-clj-time. ;)

I also don't have a strong view, that's true - but it makes me infer
(sometimes wrongly) that `libfoo-clojure` is a clojure wrapper of `libfoo`

I think we're all pretty -/+0 on this :)

> 
> And how about Leiningen plugins, then? "leiningen-plugin-foo" or
> "clojure-lein-foo"?

in Python-land it'd be

python-django-foomaker, or, more exactly, we see the following:

  python-setuptools
  python-setuptools-git

> 
> Best regards,
> 
>   Manuel

Fondly,
  Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag at debian.org>
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clojure-maintainers/attachments/20130609/5e881cba/attachment.pgp>