[Pkg-crosswire-devel] Uploading to Debian experimental -- possible?
Jonathan Marsden
jmarsden at fastmail.fm
Tue Feb 3 04:47:18 GMT 2009
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> One question: splitting the data out like this creates a new binary
> package. Does that mean that when uploaded to Debian experimental, it
> is going to languish in the "NEW" queue? Or will it still go straight
> in because the source package (bibletime) is already in Debian?
>
> NEW queue is by source package only =D
Cool, thanks for the info. That's good news.
In alphabetical order, we have:
bibledit:
No dependency on libsword7, exists in Debian already => Use experimental
biblememorizer:
No dependency on libsword7, exists in Debian already => Use experimental
bibletime:
Depends on libsword7, exists in Debian already => Waits for sword
gnomesword:
Depends on libsword7, exists in Debian already => Waits for sword
sword:
Exists in Debian already => Can use experimental (when ready!)
This suggests to me that we can perhaps "go for it" fairly soon, at
least with bibledit and biblememorizer, which do not depend on
libsword7. I doubt we can get bibletime or gnomesword in until we get
sword in, because of their direct dependency on libsword7 and build-dep
on libsword7-dev.
Is there anyone here with the privs and time/energy to look over
bibledit and biblememorizer (as they are not sword-dependent) right
away, and do whatever it takes to get them into Debian experimental? We
may want a needs-packaging bug for each of them in the Debian BTS? Once
they are in, I can file sync request bugs for each on LaunchPad, and
then we'll ask the MOTUs to approve them.
BTW, I just set up a Debian Lenny RC2 virtual machine here last night,
so I can now start to test packages under Debian (i386) as well as under
Ubuntu.
Jonathan
More information about the Pkg-crosswire-devel
mailing list