[pkg-crosswire-devel] u2o_0.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Bastian Germann]

Hi Thorsten,

This is the "Unlicense", which contains a public domain dedication.
In my opinion, this is okay as-is.

The upstream source also does not contain any copyright statement.

Policy 2.3 says:
"""
The copyright information for files in a package must be copied verbatim into 
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE/copyright, when all of the following hold:

1. the distribution license for those files requires that copyright information be included in all 
copies and/or binary distributions;
"""

1 does not hold.

Would it be okay for you to write the author's name even though the upstream source does not mention it?

Thanks,
Bastian

Am 09.02.22 um 18:00 schrieb Thorsten Alteholz:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> a license without copyright holder does not seem to be ok.
> 
>    Thorsten
> 
> 
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>