debian only svn

[Martin Lohmeier]

Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 22:59 +0200, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
>> since we use dpatch to manipulate upstream files I would suggest to
>> remove all upstream files from the subversion repository. This files are
>> never modified by us, only during the build.
> 
> Do you mean using the mergeWithUpstream mode of svn-buildpackage?

Yes, that's what I'm talking about.

But I'm not sure if dpatch is working with this kind of structure. And
since Sven mentioned the available time I would for nor agree to stick
with the current structure. When etch has has been released there may be
time to bring this topic back to menu...

I'm don't have so much experience in debian development, so I can't give
you more reasons why 'debian only svn' is better. We use it in jwchat's
colab. maintenace and it's working there (we do not use dpatch).

Maybe Roberto has more experience and pro arguments...

bye, Martin
-- 

Powered by Debian GNU / Linux

Browse my blog on http://blog.mein-horde.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20060830/8db91348/signature.pgp