cyrus-sasl2 transition status

[Fabian Fagerholm]

On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 12:17 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> My only concern is your build-dependency on libsasl2-2-dev instead of
> libsasl2-dev.  Fabian, can you comment on that?  Are we keeping the -2
> packages around?

The plan is to transition to libsasl2-2/libsasl2-2-dev. For etch, we'll
keep the old libsasl2(-dev) packages around, so it's fine to build-dep
on either.

The only possible change (that I see) to this plan is if the RMs are
against the naming transition. However, I believe we have already
addressed their (Steve Langasek's) concerns regarding the naming.

(FYI, the biggest concern with the naming change was apparently the
source package name change. That's been reverted.)

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20061122/c1eedc13/attachment.pgp