Request For Comments: SASL transition and OpenLDAP

[Roberto C. Sanchez]

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:35:26AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> Your point being that it should be possible to simply build the new
> sasl2 against the current (old-sasl linked) openldap because "new" and
> "old" sasl2 are supposed to be binary compatible?
> 
This is a good point.

> Afaict (i.e: "Builds for me, but untested.") you are right. It is
> possible to simply build-depend on libldap2-dev and build with
> --with-ldap --enable-ldapdb.
> 
Same here.  I just built it with ldap support enabled and it works.  I
think that the problems we ran into previously were because symbol
versioning wasn't actually happening.

Fabian,

Can we enable ldap support and upload again?  Or would you rather wait
until we have cleared NEW and upload again immediately after that?

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20061022/57aea7d7/attachment.pgp