/etc/sasl

[Fabian Fagerholm]

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 23:40 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> IIRC RedHat already ships RHEL 5.1 with /etc/sasl2. We'll see how this ends.
> Having configuration in /usr/lib/sasl2, /usr/lib64/sasl2 (I've seen that too) or
> /var/lib/sasl2 (Mandriva?) or associated with an applications configuration
> directory is IMHO not the way any UNIX system leaning towards FHS should do it.
> 
> I personally think /etc/sasl is a good place.

/etc/sasl2 would be more symmetrical with the other sasl* commands and
files. I think Ross' idea of creating the directory and placing a README
file in it is not bad at all.

We could then encourage other package maintainers to place default SASL
configuration files for their programs in that directory.

Opinions?

-- 
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/attachments/20080114/7a6a37da/attachment.pgp