Bug#511582: #511582: updated patch, also fixes lintian error (and a few lintian warnings)

[Guillem Jover]

On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 18:56:04 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb  1, 2010 at 00:51:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I'm wondering if we should remove the package from the archive entirely
> > as a result of this review.  I'm not comfortable NMUing a package with
> > these outstanding concerns.

> In order to remove the package, we'd have to remove its reverse
> dependencies, or change them to not need libopie-dev.  According to dak,
> that would be cyrus-sasl2, inetutils and libpam-opie.  Is opie an
> optional dependency for those packages (I'm guessing not for
> libpam-opie, no idea for the others)?

Just checked for inetutils, and it's actually not being used, upstream
removed the users, but not the configure check. I'll fix that for next
upload.

thanks,
guillem