[Pkg-deepin-devel] Bug#870042: RFS: gsettings-qt/0.1+16.04.20170729-1 [ITP]
073plan at gmail.com
Sat Aug 12 14:22:02 UTC 2017
2017-07-31 9:07 GMT+08:00 Boyuan Yang <073plan at gmail.com>:
> 2017-07-31 9:04 GMT+08:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> <perezmeyer at gmail.com>:
>> On sábado, 29 de julio de 2017 11:21:40 -03 Pino Toscano wrote:
>>> I'm not uploading it myself,
>> Neither me, but I wanted to add some more info to what Pino already provided.
>>> but there are various things that ought to
>>> be fixed:
>>> a) qtchooser is not needed in Build-Depends, it's an "implementation
>> You might want to take a look at
>>> b) we don't use a "qtdeclarative5-" prefix for QML modules, but
>> See <http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/qmlmodulesnaming.html>
>> Alas, I am dying beyond my means.
>> Oscar Wilde, as he sipped champagne on his deathbed
>> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> Thank you all for the detailed review, which really helps.
> I'm not really familiar with C++/Qt/KDE packaging but this package
> falls in this range as a dependency unfortunately.
> I will read those instructions and fix problems.
> Boyuan Yang
OK. All problems mentioned above should be fixed now, both in git repo
and source package
on mentors.debian.net. (Many thanks to pino@ and perezmeyer.)
Future development and upstream maintenance is likely be taken by
Deepin Co.,Ltd. if
Canonical quits since Deepin software depends on this package heavily.
is working together with deepin upstream on it. As a result I believe
n) should not be a blocker
for package uploading.
Package maintainer was set back to pkg-deepin since we are taking care
of it in reality. Thanks
for the suggestion.
After enabling the test, this package would fail one test in Debian
Unstable. Investigations show
that it is a bug of Qt 5.7.  This bug has been fixed since Qt 5.8.
Qt in Ubuntu already have this bug fixed by backporting upstream patch.
With no visible time schedule for new Qt in Debian, I choose to
disable that test for now and re-enable
it after Qt 5.9 enters unstable. Meanwhile, anyone interested please
consider reviewing the package
again and help sponsor this package if you feel comfortable. This
package is blocking the workflow of
pkg-deepin team and it would be great if we could get the problem
fixed in a reasonable time period.
More information about the Pkg-deepin-devel