[Pkg-e-devel] pkg-e stack update for freerunner?

Nikita V. Youshchenko yoush at debian.org
Sun Feb 22 08:03:00 UTC 2009

> > > > > Indeed, I finished pushing everything to git yesterday, although
> > > > > I haven't tagged them for upload yet
> > >
> > > source packages now available in
> > > http://alioth.debian.org/~lutin-guest/sources/2009/
> >
> > I will build armel packages for freerunner.
> In evas/debian/control, you forgot to rename libevas-
> and libevas- to their 0.50b equivalents.

Although I see this is strictly not necessary...

But I was not necessary to rename libevas-engines to 
libevas- as well, because renaming pf libevas package is 
enough to handle binary-incompatibility hell, dependences will do the 

I still thing it is ugly to have libevas- together with 
We should rename back to libevas-engines, or rename to 

Using unversioned libevas-engines name may be better because other packages 
have to depend on it, so versioned libevas-engines name makes maintaince 
of those a bit harder (e.g. have to fix debian/control instead of just 

What do you think?


I've stopped rebuilding pkg-e things for pkg-fso until this is resolved, to 
avoid pkg-fso having package naming different from what will be in debian.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-e-devel/attachments/20090222/3acf8b05/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Pkg-e-devel mailing list