[Pkg-e-devel] pkg-e stack update for freerunner?

Nikita V. Youshchenko yoush at debian.org
Sun Feb 22 12:17:05 UTC 2009

> > I still thing it is ugly to have libevas- together with
> > libevas-
> > We should rename back to libevas-engines, or rename to
> > libevas-
> I did the latter yesterday.

I think your change is incomplete.

You should also add Conflicts/Replaces with 050a version, or upgrade will 
likely fail.

> You might be interested in subscribing to 
> pkg-e-commits [1], it's relatively low-traffic and that probably would
> make it easier for you to track changes.

Thanks for the hint, will subscribe.

> > Using unversioned libevas-engines name may be better because other
> > packages have to depend on it, so versioned libevas-engines name makes
> > maintaince of those a bit harder (e.g. have to fix debian/control
> > instead of just rebuild).
> >
> > What do you think?
> I completely agree. In fact, I was about to make the same proposal. I'll
> do the changes today

Ok, waiting for that.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-e-devel/attachments/20090222/802ca76c/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Pkg-e-devel mailing list