[Pkg-e-devel] status of etk

Albin Tonnerre albin.tonnerre at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 20:42:35 UTC 2009

On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:31:31PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote :
> Hey,
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:31:40PM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote :
> > I would like to ask you what is the status of libetk, as there are
> > several interesting applications for e17 which would need this toolbox. 
> > 
> I've put some work there [1] quite some time ago, and have not touched it since.
> Although I know there are applications out there using etk (I've been told some
> SHR stuff does, but I'd like to know what interesting applications you're
> talking about anyway), I'm not planning on working towards uploading etk to the
> archive. If it's really necessary, I guess I can put it in shape and poke
> pkg-fso to get etk uploaded there, though.
> The reason for this is that etk is no longer actively developped, and barely
> actively maintained. Applications using it should seriously consider using etk

I mean ewl, not etk

Albin Tonnerre
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-e-devel/attachments/20090702/46d7abf7/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-e-devel mailing list