[Pkg-e-devel] Updated Debian packages for Enlightenment
josch at debian.org
Fri Nov 20 14:47:16 UTC 2015
Quoting Ross Vandegrift (2015-11-20 15:39:22)
> Originally, I meant importing upstream, not renaming. I left the name
> "e17" alone just to reduce change, and keep things simpler. It is
> misleading, and I like the idea of fixing it.
then I think it would be sensible to let the source package be named
"enlightenment". This is also how upstream names their source package:
It would also make things easier (by not having to go through the binary-NEW
queue every time a new upstream release happens) if the binary package
containing e would be named "enlightenment" as well. I don't think there is a
use case for being able to install e17 together with e19 or some such.
> But lintian doesn't like "e". It triggers source-field-malformed, citing
> 5.6.1 of the policy manual. "enlightenment" is another possibility. I
> thought that was used by DR16 packages, but the changelog indicates it was
right, I totally missed the last sentence of §5.6.1.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
More information about the Pkg-e-devel