[Pkg-e-devel] Symbol files incorrect with respect to eo?

[Ross Vandegrift]

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2018-03-10 Andreas Metzler <ametzler at bebt.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> 
> > I suspect the symbol files for efl are not correct with respect to the
> > EO API. Rebuilding edbus against efl/experimental triggers EO-strict
> > dependencies:
> 
> > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.9.14), libecore1 (>= [-1.7.7), libeina1-] {+1.20.7-0~eo), libeina1a+} (>= [-1.0.0~beta),-] {+1.20.7-0~eo),+} libevas1 (>= [-1.7.7)-] {+1.20.7-0~eo)+}
> 
> > I thought EO was the new (unstable) API, does the ancient edbus really
> > use it?
> 
> Sorry for the noise, seems to have been discussed ages ago.
> 
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-e-devel/2015-December/002459.html

Yes, that's correct.

Since edbus has been deprecated & replaced, I was planning on filing a removal
request.  The only reverse depends left is e17, which will go away after EFL
transitions and new enlightenment is uploaded to experimental.

Does it need to remain?

Ross