[Pkg-electronics-devel] Accepted as DM

[Wesley J. Landaker]

On Tuesday 06 April 2010 13:43:40 أحمد المحمودي wrote:
>   Also there's another matter: currently the packages covered & gtkwave
>   got DMUA set, I've learnt some days ago, that this should be done with
>   consent of sponsor. I didn't seek explicit consent for those two
>   (although I mentioned it in gtkwave's last changelog). Currently I am
>   (co-)maintaining the following packages in the team:
> 
>   geda-gaf
>   geda-xgsch2pcb
>   gwave
>   iverilog
>   pcb
> 
>   Is it alright to set DMUA for those packages ?

I think I'd be happy if we just said DMUA is fine by default for anything 
maintained by the pkg-electronics team, unless a package is specifically 
excluded for some reason.

Does that seem reasonable to everyone? Or is there a reason we should be more 
conservative than that?