[Pkg-electronics-devel] Sigrok RFSs

[Zoltan Gyarmati]

Dear Andreas & All,

Please see my comments inline,

On 03/15/2017 09:28 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:35:47AM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote:
>>> I agree that if there is a pkg-electronics team that is fine for me.
>>> What would be not fine is if this team is not updating the electronics
>>> task of Debian Science.  Please make sure that all relevant packages are
>>> mentioned there!
>> IMHO the pkg-electronics could be indeed a more appropriate place for
>> maintaining
>> these packages, and also, they should be listed on the Debian
>> Science/Electronics task.
> Fine.  BTW, in principle there is most probably room for an own Debian
> Electronics Blend with its own fine grained tasks.  Two years ago Debian
> Astro evolved from Debian Science and it was a great success.  If you
> are interested I could prepare some framework template for electronics.
>
>> I believe that the packages are ready for the first iteration of review,
>> and i also
>> uploaded them to mentors.debian.net, pls find here [1] the aggregated list.
> Well, I admit I take the freedom to sponsor right from team VCS only.
> If you want me to sponsor your packages (which I happily do) just tell
> me via "Sponsoring of Blends" page the Vcs location and the task a
> package belongs to.  My reason for deriving from the established
> sponsoring procedure is to make Blends more popular (which is obviously
> needed :-P)

Yes, i would be happy to push my listed git repos to a team VCS, and
thank you for the
offering the sponsoration although before we go any further (mainly to
avoid any duplicated effort)
i want to see what would be the way we cooperate on this with Aaron and
the pkg-electronics team.
As i'm rather new in contributing to Debian itself, i'm a bit lost here
how to proceed with this,
so maybe you and/or Dima and/or Bdale could figure out how to do this.

>
>> The only issue i became aware of that these packages are released for
>> unstable
>> but they should be uploaded to experimental (due to the stretch freeze),
> New packages can easily go to unstable.  They will not migrate to testing
> anyway.
These are not new packages, they have been RFA-d by Uwe (the current
maintainer)
a month back see [1].

>
>>  It seems we nicely teamed up to maintain this,
>> how should we proceed, should be check the corresponding
>> RFAs to ITA?
> Hmmm, I admit I do not understand this question.
 As these packages are requested for adoption again, see [1] according
to my understanding on
the debian mentors docs (see  for example [2]) i (or my mentor/sponsor?)
have to set it to ITA.

>
> Thanks for your work on the electronics packages
>
>        Andreas.
>  
>> [1]
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport


[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852830
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852831
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852832
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852833
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852834
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852835

[2]
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_make_my_first_package.3F

Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-electronics-devel/attachments/20170315/40af8650/attachment.sig>