[Pkg-electronics-devel] Sigrok RFSs

Zoltan Gyarmati mr.zoltan.gyarmati at gmail.com
Thu Mar 16 13:13:58 UTC 2017


Dear All,

On 03/15/2017 02:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:32:36PM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote:
>> Please see my comments inline,
> Sure.  What else. :-P
>  
>> Yes, i would be happy to push my listed git repos to a team VCS, and
>> thank you for the
>> offering the sponsoration although before we go any further (mainly to
>> avoid any duplicated effort)
>> i want to see what would be the way we cooperate on this with Aaron and
>> the pkg-electronics team.
>> As i'm rather new in contributing to Debian itself, i'm a bit lost here
>> how to proceed with this,
>> so maybe you and/or Dima and/or Bdale could figure out how to do this.
> Some teams have developed a team policy that helps newcomers.  I'm not
> sure about the pkg-electronics team but reading the Debian Science
> policy[3] could give some helpful hints that might be true for other
> teams as well.  (Actually the Debian Science policy os not really well
> maintained, Debian Med one is better and Debian GIS and Debian Astro are
> more current an possibly better structured.  Just do a web search and
> read what you consider the most readable one.  Its an open task to merge
> those documents and just maintain group specific issues separately but
> nobody has taken over this task so far.)
>
>>> New packages can easily go to unstable.  They will not migrate to testing
>>> anyway.
>> These are not new packages, they have been RFA-d by Uwe (the current
>> maintainer)
>> a month back see [1].
> Ahhh, OK, thank experimental is correct - sorry for the noise.
>  
>>>>  It seems we nicely teamed up to maintain this,
>>>> how should we proceed, should be check the corresponding
>>>> RFAs to ITA?
>>> Hmmm, I admit I do not understand this question.
>>  As these packages are requested for adoption again, see [1] according
>> to my understanding on
>> the debian mentors docs (see  for example [2]) i (or my mentor/sponsor?)
>> have to set it to ITA.
> Yes, please set it to ITA:

OK, thx.
@Aaron, as you were/are also working on this, do you have any objection
if i set these RFA bugs to ITA for myself and start the
sponsoring/reviewing process of the uploaded packages [1] with Andreas
and anybody else who is interested?
Any comment from the electronics-devel side?

Thanks for the help, regards,

Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de


[1]
https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok
https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli
https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-electronics-devel/attachments/20170316/6baf74a8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-electronics-devel mailing list