[Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1100873: Conflicting binary packages (Was: Bug#1100873: urjtag_2021.03-3_ppc64el-buildd.changes REJECTED)

[Matthias Geiger]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:15, Andreas Tille <andreas at an3as.eu> wrote:
>Am Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:19:36AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>> 8. Thorsten answered[7] only to the list which I do not read regularly
>
>Sorry for the confusion. It turns out my procmail is configured to move
>emails from that list into a folder I don't check frequently. So, it was
>my fault that Thorsten's message didn't reach me.
>
>> 9. Thorsten uploaded liburjtag[8] 2024.03.24-1 on
>>     Wed, 05 Mar 2025 19:06:36 +0100
>>    with no notification of any involved party.
>
>Waiting 14 days was understandable, but I'm not sure if replacing one
>issue with another-without filing an appropriate bug report-is the best
>course of action.
>
>[...]
Hi,

> From my perspective, renaming one of the liburjtag binary packages 
> would
> be a reasonable approach. While the first-come, first-served rule
> usually applies, I believe it would make sense for the main urjtag
> project to provide the appropriately named libraries, whereas a fork
> should have a distinct name.

agreed.

It is causing an issue now due to the wrong takeover of the binary 
packages. I happenend to come across this by chance when doing a team 
upload of urjtag to fix an RC bug.
Filing this as its own issue is definitly warranted. Not sure what the 
best course of action here is tbh.
Regardless, I'm busy until 1st of April and hope this will be sorted 
out.

best,

werdahias