[Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1130963: ftbfs on hppa: libboost_program_options.so.1.90.0 (64 bit, need 32)
John David Anglin
dave.anglin at bell.net
Mon Mar 16 17:38:22 GMT 2026
Some other 1.90.0 boost packages have the same issue and this breaks a number of other
package builds on hppa.
The issue is boost was built on a 64-bit capable hppa system (hppa64) but currently
hppa only supports 32-bit runtime. I don't know anything about configuring boost
but I think it needs to be configured to 32-bit mode on hppa.
Dave
On 2026-03-16 9:17 a.m., Simon Richter wrote:
> Source: nextpnr
> Version: 0.10-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-hppa at lists.debian.org, sjr at debian.org
> User: debian-hppa at lists.debian.org
> Usertags: hppa
>
> Hi,
>
> After Boost 1.90 compatibility was fixed, only hppa still has issues:
>
> CMake Error at /usr/lib/hppa-linux-gnu/cmake/Boost-1.90.0/BoostConfig.cmake:141 (find_package):
> Found package configuration file:
>
> /usr/lib/hppa-linux-gnu/cmake/boost_program_options-1.90.0/boost_program_options-config.cmake
>
> but it set boost_program_options_FOUND to FALSE so package
> "boost_program_options" is considered to be NOT FOUND. Reason given by
> package:
>
> No suitable build variant has been found.
>
> The following variants have been tried and rejected:
>
> * libboost_program_options.so.1.90.0 (64 bit, need 32)
>
> * libboost_program_options.a (64 bit, need 32)
>
> I'd assume that this is a problem in either boost or cmake, but this
> needs to be properly investigated.
>
> Simon
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 13.3
> APT prefers stable-security
> APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 6.12.73+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/20 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin at bell.net
More information about the Pkg-electronics-devel
mailing list