Bug#265387: marked as done (exim4-config: shouldn't /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf be a conffile?)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner@bugs.debian.org
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:49:01 -0700


Your message dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:20:12 +0200
with message-id <20040813082012.GD6395@downhill.at.eu.org>
and subject line Bug#265387: exim4-config: shouldn't /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf be a conffile?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2004 22:59:29 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Thu Aug 12 15:59:29 2004
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from smtp2.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.63] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BvOXg-0006LT-00; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:59:28 -0700
Received: from jidanni1 (TC210-203-44-36.3-16.dynamic.ebtnet.net [210.203.44.36])
	by smtp2.apol.com.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA26288232
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:59:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by jidanni1 with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BvM51-0001Jv-7Y; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:21:43 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: exim4-config: shouldn't /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf be a conffile?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:21:43 +0800
Message-Id: <E1BvM51-0001Jv-7Y@jidanni1>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.34-2
Severity: minor

Shouldn't
/etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
be listed by
$ dlocate -conf exim4-config ?

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265387-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2004 08:20:16 +0000
>From ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org Fri Aug 13 01:20:16 2004
Return-path: <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
Received: from server.logic.univie.ac.at [131.130.190.41] ([PYqgK13lyocPaVJkQ54k6PLMtft5134x])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BvXIN-0004ld-00; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 01:20:15 -0700
Received: from m-134-246.adsl.univie.ac.at ([131.130.134.246])
	by server.logic.univie.ac.at with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BvXIK-0008Vr-Cx
	for 265387-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:20:14 +0200
Received: from ametzler by downhill.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BvXIK-0008QW-RR
	for 265387-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:20:12 +0200
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:20:12 +0200
From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
To: 265387-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#265387: exim4-config: shouldn't /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf be a conffile?
Message-ID: <20040813082012.GD6395@downhill.at.eu.org>
References: <E1BvM51-0001Jv-7Y@jidanni1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1BvM51-0001Jv-7Y@jidanni1>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: BCF7 1345 BE42 B5B8 1A57  EE09 1D33 9C65 8B8D 7663
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: 265387-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

On 2004-08-12 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> wrote:
> Package: exim4-config
> Version: 4.34-2
> Severity: minor

> Shouldn't
> /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
> be listed by
> $ dlocate -conf exim4-config ?

No, as it is not managed by dpkg and not shipped in the debian
package.

Quoting policy

| 10.7.1 Definitions
| 
| configuration file
| A file that affects the operation of a program, or provides site- or
| host-specific information, or otherwise customizes the behavior of a
| program.  Typically, configuration files are intended to be modified
| by the system administrator (if needed or desired) to conform to local
| policy or to provide more useful site-specific behavior. 
| 
| conffile
| A file listed in a package's conffiles file, and is treated specially
| by dpkg (see Details of configuration, Section 6.6). 
| 
| The distinction between these two is important; they are not
| interchangeable concepts. Almost all conffiles are configuration
| files, but many configuration files are not conffiles.
| 
[...]
| 
| 10.7.3 Behavior
| 
| Configuration file handling must conform to the following behavior:
| 
|     * local changes must be preserved during a package upgrade, and
|     * configuration files must be preserved when the package is
|       removed, and only deleted when the package is purged.
| 
| The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the configuration
| file a conffile. This is appropriate only if it is possible to
| distribute a default version that will work for most installations,
| although some system administrators may choose to modify it. This
| implies that the default version will be part of the package
| distribution, and must not be modified by the maintainer scripts
| during installation (or at any other time).
| 
| In order to ensure that local changes are preserved correctly, no
| package may contain or make hard links to conffiles.[55]
| 
| The other way to do it is via the maintainer scripts. In this case,
| the configuration file must not be listed as a conffile and must not
| be part of the package distribution.


-- 
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"