Bug#307370: marked as done (update-exim4.conf.8.gz: implications of multiple hosts)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner@bugs.debian.org
Tue, 03 May 2005 17:03:12 -0700
Your message dated Wed, 04 May 2005 06:07:38 +0800
with message-id <87br7snetx.fsf@jidanni.org>
and subject line update-exim4.conf.8.gz: implications of multiple hosts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 20:29:58 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Mon May 02 13:29:58 2005
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DShYE-0003Ak-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:29:58 -0700
Received: from tc218-187-80-170.2-7.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.80.170]:33169 helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50 #2)
id 1DShY9-000544-Pe by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 03 May 2005 01:59:54 +0530
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: update-exim4.conf.8.gz: implications of multiple hosts
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:32:05 +0800
Message-Id: <E1DSSbF-00058r-Ga@jidanni1>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.50-6
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/man/man8/update-exim4.conf.8.gz
You mention
dc_smarthost
List of hosts to which all outgoing mail is passed to and that
takes care of delivering it. Multiple hosts are colon separated,
and all deliveries go out to TCP port 25. Specifying different
ports is not (yet) possible due to upstream restrictions. Used
as value of the DCsmarthost macro.
but you don't say what this does:
*Uses both hosts in parallel?
*Uses first host, and if not working, then uses second host?
Etc. etc.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 23:58:05 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Tue May 03 16:58:05 2005
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DT7HB-0004Sg-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 16:58:05 -0700
Received: from tc218-187-83-12.2-7.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.83.12]:34971 helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50 #2)
id 1DT7H8-0009bv-Ex by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <307370-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 04 May 2005 05:28:04 +0530
To: 307370-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: update-exim4.conf.8.gz: implications of multiple hosts
References: <E1DSSbF-00058r-Ga@jidanni1>
<20050503192643.GA32629@lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de>
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 06:07:38 +0800
Message-ID: <87br7snetx.fsf@jidanni.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 307370-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
>> *Uses both hosts in parallel?
M> Explain how this could be possible.
I don't know, but it would sure be nice. I've usually got 20 mails to
send but only 10 minutes to send them in.
>> *Uses first host, and if not working, then uses second host?
M> This is the way it is done.
M> Committed a clarifying sentence to svn.
OK. Then I'll close this.