Bug#398224: Re: This is a design flaw
Andreas Metzler
ametzler at downhill.at.eu.org
Tue Feb 8 17:37:51 UTC 2011
On 2011-02-06 Dominic Hargreaves <dom at earth.li> wrote:
[...]
> Are there any other possibilites that have been developed over the last
> few years for solving this sort of problem?
Not really, no.
Howwever I have grown quite strongly oppoesed to add special
(disabled by default) greylisting code to the default configuration.
Judging from reading exim-users there seem to be two widely different
approaches to greylisting:
#1 run it very early (after rcpt verification) since it is cheap on the
recipient side
#2 run it late, only for suspicious senders (i.e. after DATA, for high
spam-scores)
Also at least for #2 people often do away with the daemon and use
exim's sqlite lookup http://wiki.exim.org/SimpleGreylisting
There are multiple daemons available, most requiring different setups.
(Me personally I am using postgrey.)
cu andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
More information about the Pkg-exim4-maintainers
mailing list