Bug#653750: Does an `if' missing in `the condition is true there is at least one'?

[Regid Ichira]

--- On Mon, 3/19/12, Adam D. Barratt <adam adam-barratt org uk> wrote:

> > +  * If "!==" or "!=&" is used, the condition if is true there is at least one
> 
> That doesn't make sense.  It should be "the condition is true if there is at
> least one".
> 


  Right.  I hope I couldn't confuse myself once again:

--- a/spec.txt   2012-03-21 03:22:39.557761281 +0200
+++ b/spec.txt   2012-03-21 03:22:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -25571,7 +25571,7 @@ the precise opposite of the behaviour ab
     If the DNS lookup yields both 127.0.0.1 and 127.0.0.2, the condition is
     false because 127.0.0.1 matches.

-  * If "!==" or "!=&" is used, the condition is true there is at least one
+  * If "!==" or "!=&" is used, the condition is true if there is at least one
     looked up IP address that does not match. Consider:

     dnslists = a.b.c!=&0.0.0.1