Bug#823418: Acknowledgement (exim4: Since the last update, it seems like some messages are rejected after DATA)

[David Hill]

False alarm... it didn't fix anything.


On 05/04/2016 12:19 PM, David Hill wrote:
> Setting DISABLE_DKIM_VERIFY='true' solved my problem.
>
>
> On 05/04/2016 11:58 AM, David Hill wrote:
>> One sample of the dropped message that seems to have started on Apr 18.
>>
>> T To: spamtrap at binarystorm.net
>> R Reply-To: carrieres at workopolis.com
>> F From: "Workopolis Alerte aux Emploi" <carrieres at em.workopolis.com>
>> 2016-04-29 03:36:36 1aw2ya-0004Lo-0P H=localhost (binarystorm.net) 
>> [127.0.0.1] F=<bounce at workopolis.hosted.strongview.com> rejected 
>> after DATA
>> Envelope-from: <bounce at workopolis.hosted.strongview.com>
>> Envelope-to: <eth1 at localhost>
>> P Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=binarystorm.net)
>>         by wolfe with esmtp (Exim 4.87)
>>         (envelope-from <bounce at workopolis.hosted.strongview.com>)
>>         id 1aw2ya-0004Lo-0P
>>         for eth1 at localhost; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 03:36:36 -0400
>> P Received: from sv114102.hosted.strongview.com 
>> (sv114102.hosted.strongview.com [104.130.114.102])
>>         by 00416.ve.carpathiahost.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with 
>> ESMTP id u3T7XAla028768
>>         for <spamtrap at binarystorm.net>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 03:33:10 -0400
>> P Received: from sv114102.hosted.strongview.com ([10.134.137.195])
>>         by sv114102.hosted.strongview.com (-); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 
>> 03:33:09 -0400
>>   X-VirtualServer: Marketing, sv114102.hosted.strongview.com, 
>> 172.18.101.102
>>   X-VirtualServerGroup: Marketing
>>   X-MailingID: 16781227::5951::2655::276::1_6525::6525_11810509_0__6525
>>   X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID"
>>   X-Destination-ID: spamtrap at binarystorm.net
>>   X-SMFBL: d29ya29wb2xpc0BiaW5hcnlzdG9ybS5uZXQ=
>>   DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=em.workopolis.com;
>>         s=sv; i=@em.workopolis.com; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:
>> Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:
>>         X-ReportingKey:Subject:Date:To:Reply-To:From; bh=z04E7IWoqjQ1H97
>>         aoB/x4hpf1so=; b=L0n1NCy5gy8wupisAYEouaX4q2ibSVxXOG5jH55aSf1GI4O
>> nV5RX5wqueLeTMpoiBOKUNPZyJI39X1k5b2EIg75ZcMt4v3gX59iXe/J4ByFAs6K
>> Av5oEBp7923I3WaogW71TW2HZ1DvWET27k0YCl55XI2spHKMT/2yR8cPzrWE=
>>   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>   Content-Disposition: inline
>>   Content-Type: text/html;
>>         charset="UTF-8"
>>   MIME-Version: 1.0
>> I Message-ID: <16781227.6525 at em.workopolis.com>
>>   X-ReportingKey: 
>> MJG9NET76XKKB2LJJI1RJ4EBH1XI1R::spamtrap at binarystorm.net::1_6525
>>   Subject: Your Job Alert for 29/04/2016 (Daily-1_EN)
>>   Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 03:33:09 -0400
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/04/2016 11:09 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>>>
>>> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
>>> has been received.
>>>
>>> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
>>> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>>>
>>> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>>>   Exim4 Maintainers <pkg-exim4-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org>
>>>
>>> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
>>> send it to 823418 at bugs.debian.org.
>>>
>>> Please do not send mail to owner at bugs.debian.org unless you wish
>>> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.