4.95 backport to bullseye for SRS

[Matt Corallo]

Wow thanks!

I'm sorry, I'd meant to forward it to you but didn't get around to it - 
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20220523.141058.61d42ffb.en.html (thread at 
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/thread/20220524.090254.9abd65b7.en.html ) may also have been a 
candidate as a blocker, not sure what you make of that thread.

Matt

On 5/26/22 10:12 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2022-05-16 Andreas Metzler <ametzler at bebt.de> wrote:
>> On 2022-05-16 Matt Corallo <dbrbse at mattcorallo.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>> In any case, like the title says, SRS is quite a useful feature, it would be
>>> nice if there were a way to get it directly on bullseye(-backports) without
>>> implementing it in filters.
> [...]
>> backport. I have had it on my radar for quite some time but consider
>> https://bugs.debian.org/1004740 /
>> https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2886 a blocker for a backport.
> 
>> I will revisit the issue when this is resolved.
> 
> Hello Matt,
> 
> I have uploaded but since it is new backport and not a update to an
> existing one it will take a little time because somebody will review it.
> 
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html
> 
> cu Andreas