[Pkg-exim4-users] FAQ related question (Exim+spamassassin)

Magnus Holmgren holmgren at lysator.liu.se
Sun Dec 3 03:15:36 CET 2006


On Friday 20 October 2006 12:35, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:22:06AM -0600, Chris Purves wrote:
> > And of course, sa-exim is much easier to set up.  The main thing you
> > want for proper integration with exim is to be able to reject
> > high-scoring mails which both options allow, so either way is the right
> > way.
>
> sa-exim has been orphaned in early 2006, nobody seems to take care of
> it in Debian. Additionally, there does not seem to be sa-exim
> knowledge on this list.

Somebody is taking care of it now. :-)

I hope you're satisfied with the resolution of #378732.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren at lysator.liu.se
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

  "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for 
   Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-exim4-users/attachments/20061203/68339879/attachment.pgp


More information about the Pkg-exim4-users mailing list