[pymvpa] significance assessment: yet another issue...
axel.vadim at gmail.com
Wed May 25 17:01:02 UTC 2011
There are six subjects (rows)
Class 1 and Class 2 are correct predictions of each class (two values on the
diagonal of the confusion matrix). The Total column is the average between
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, J.A. Etzel <jetzel at artsci.wustl.edu> wrote:
> I'm missing something here: where are the "class 1" and "class 2" numbers
> for each person coming from?
> I agree that describing the results of a multiclass classification is
> tricky, especially when using something naturally two-class like svms.
> Reporting the multiclass accuracy rate, then the pairwise ones seems most
> On 5/24/2011 2:09 AM, Vadim Axel wrote:
>> Attached an output of one such pathological case (completely real data).
>> I even do not talk about splits. It's sufficient that for half subjects
>> you have 0.8/0.4 prediction and for other half you have 0.4/0.8...
>> For more than two classes it really becomes hardly maintainable. I
>> recently had 5 classes experiment and I ended up reporting each classes
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
>> <debian at onerussian.com <mailto:debian at onerussian.com>> wrote:
>> it is a good thesis indeed, especially for the case of multiclass
>> classification where people make claims about unraveling complex
>> categorical structure, whenever it is only few categories which get
>> "significantly" well classified.
>> And your illustration goes even further than your verbal description --
>> at first I thought that there is an error, since I expected at least
>> class to be significant when "average" accuracy becomes significant.
>> But indeed it might be not the case, e.g. if a classifier favors one
>> class over another across splits, thus none of the classes come out
>> a consistently "significant" performance while mean accuracy does
>> you check if that is indeed the case by looking on per split
>> diagonals?). Cool. I always thought that digging in the mud is
>> very entertaining ;)
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Vadim Axel wrote:
>> > Attached an illustration for my thesis.
>> > The average classification rate can be considered significant,
>> while we
>> > clearly see that it is not exactly true...
> Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list
> Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA at lists.alioth.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA