[Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#739311: marked as done (fglrx-driver depend on glx-alternative-fglrx (>= 0.4.1~) but wheezy-backports have 0.4.0~bpo70+1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2014 04:41:17 +0100
with message-id <5302D65D.1020401 at debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#739311: fglrx-driver depend on glx-alternative-fglrx (>= 0.4.1~) but wheezy-backports have 0.4.0~bpo70+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #739311,
regarding fglrx-driver depend on glx-alternative-fglrx (>= 0.4.1~) but wheezy-backports have 0.4.0~bpo70+1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
739311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: mdt <mdt at cryptolab.net>
Subject: fglrx-driver depend on glx-alternative-fglrx (>= 0.4.1~) but wheezy-backports have 0.4.0~bpo70+1
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:32:09 +0100
Size: 4393
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fglrx-devel/attachments/20140218/e5a94f9f/attachment-0002.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#739311: fglrx-driver depend on glx-alternative-fglrx (>= 0.4.1~) but wheezy-backports have 0.4.0~bpo70+1
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 04:41:17 +0100
Size: 2224
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fglrx-devel/attachments/20140218/e5a94f9f/attachment-0003.mht>