[Pkg-fonts-devel] Should we comaintain fontforge?

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Ognyan Kulev (ogi at fmi.uni-sofia.bg):
> Kęstutis Biliūnas wrote:
> >And, if you  will agree, I will rename the bug #357867 against wnpp to
> >ITA, with:   
> >
> >Owner: Debian Fonts Packages Maintenance Team
> ><pkg-fonts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> 
> I think that Maintainer: better be person, and Uploaders: may include 
> other people and lists.  This was discussed but there was no decision AFAIR.


Yes. As no agreement has been reached yet, I prefer we keep a standard
setup with Kęstutis as maintainer and the list in Uploaders (that
won't be really useful, but will state that the team is a
"co-maintainer" on packages.qa.d.o).

We also can  subscribe the list (or a dedicated
pkg-fonts-bugs at alioth.d.o) to the PTS for the package.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20060403/d3d9a8fa/attachment.pgp