[Pkg-fonts-devel] Should we comaintain fontforge?

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Kęstutis Biliūnas (kebil at kaunas.init.lt):
> Hi,
> 
> I have prepared the new version of the fontforge-0.0.20060406-1 package.
> 
> Closes: 316892 328217 333548 336056 342180 344124 357867 361107 361289
> 
> The package, can be found on my repository at
> http://kebil.ghost.lt/debian/pool/fontforge/
> 
> Maybe somebody can to test this package.

I still don't understand the situation with fontforge.

The listed maintainer, Chanop, is either MIA or willing to give the
package away.

However, in the same time, I see George Williams <gww at silcom.com>
posting in the BTS about "applied" patches by Ian Jackson (see
#361107), these patches seem to come from ubuntu (Ian is a Canonical
employee, IIRC).



I think we'd better get in touch with them both to sort out what's
happening.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20060409/4eae1033/attachment.pgp