[Pkg-fonts-devel] Should we comaintain fontforge?

[Paul Wise]

On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:33 +0100, Mohammed Trojette wrote:
> Reading the DWN, I've seen
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357867
>   FontForge
> Shouldn't we think of comaintaining it?

I'm thinking definitely if no-one steps up in a week or so. Chanop also
orphaned some other fonts related packages. I've asked someone in the NM
queue with a @linux.thai.net address if s/he would like to adopt the
Thai related packages (inc some fonts), if they decline, we should take
the fonts too, and ask debian-i18n about the others. I think we should
check the debian-qa packages for font-related stuff as well.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20060322/a8ea6b73/attachment.pgp