[Pkg-fonts-devel] Should we comaintain fontforge?

Christian Perrier bubulle at debian.org
Sat Mar 25 06:06:47 UTC 2006

> I'm absolutely not thrilled of seeing lists as maintainers of more and more 
> packages.  Ask our release managers - there were cases where a list was set 
> as maintainer, and when the release mgr contacted the maintainer address 
> because some relatively urgent action was necessary, nobody on that list 
> felt compelled to react.

The list can be the Maintainer, which allows for group reception of
bug reports and the like....and individuals can be listed in

They thus become "Co-maintainers" and appear as is on
packages.qa.debian.org pages. See
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/shadow.html for instance.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20060325/bd0bfd27/attachment.pgp

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list