[Pkg-fonts-devel] Draining the font swamp

[Christian Perrier]

(sorry for crossposting again while I'm not subscribed to ubuntu*
lists...you guys might want to whitelist me..:-))

> font design (inkscape, fontforge, fonts:ttf), do we still need DeFoMa's
> approach? Is DeFoMa really maintained?


To this very question, I would answer "no", at least by reading its
changelog. I'd be happy to be proven wrong


 -- Thomas Huriaux <thomas.huriaux at gmail.com>  Sat,  3 Feb 2007 11:19:08 +0100
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Thu,  6 Jul 2006 21:55:55 +0100
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:29:34 +0100
 -- Frank Lichtenheld <djpig at debian.org>  Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:27:43 +0200
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Tue, 25 May 2004 20:45:29 +1000
 -- Angus Lees <angus.lees at urnet.com.au>  Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:44:53 +1100
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Sat,  3 Jan 2004 12:16:04 +1100
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:26:56 +1000
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:50:44 +1000
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:02:50 +1000
 -- Angus Lees <gus at debian.org>  Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:24:33 +1000
 -- Yasuhiro Take <take at debian.org>  Sat, 11 May 2002 00:23:53 +0900
 -- Yasuhiro Take <take at debian.org>  Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:09:35 +0900



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20070521/6c5816ca/attachment.pgp