[Pkg-fonts-devel] Lintian error with new font package name convention

[Rogério Brito]

Hi, Nicolas.

Thanks for the reply.

On Apr 19 2011, Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
> On 13/02/11 02:27, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Nicolas, do you have anything written already? I'm not sure if the best
> > thing would be to have it on a repository or on a Wiki.
> 
> Hi Rogério and other fellow pkg-fonts team members, a quick note to
> mention that I've had to be offline and focusing on other projects for a
> while and I apologize for my lack of involvement in the recent threads.
> 
> I'm hoping to be available again soon.

OK. I've also had to had an hiatus for some personal reasons and I may be
coming soon again.

> I'll quickly mention that on the issue of fonts, their sources and
> requiring or recreating a fully Debian-specific buildpath there are
> plenty of posts from me on the issues in the archives of this list
> though (in the huge amount of spam but that's another story), please
> take a moment to look through them.

Yes, I am more malleable now :-) and I think that I will incorporate the
language of RFC 2119 in our policy.

With that, I think that some of the MUST will be changed to
SHOULD/RECOMMENDED so that some flexibility is allowed.


Regards,

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br