[Pkg-fonts-devel] any idea when we will have font-anonymous-pro in debian/ubuntu
thep at linux.thai.net
Sat Aug 27 08:13:14 UTC 2011
2011/6/21 Christian PERRIER <bubulle at debian.org>:
> Quoting shirish शिरीष (shirishag75 at gmail.com):
>> >From that document it seems that somewhere in the future binary
>> packages would be *type*-*name* or/and *type*-*foundry*-*name* which
>> I think when it would come into force would entail rebuilding some of
>> the other existing fonts perhaps (with conflicts to the old name) .
> Not "type", but always "fonts", whatever type of font we have (ttf,
> otf, etc.). The font type (which is now most often TrueType or
> OpenType) is indeed not really relevant for users.
Sorry, I missed this thread, and was surprised to see new font
packages with this convention, which is different from what I read
long time ago:
To my understanding, "fonts" is to be used with source package,
not binary. Is there any documentation I've missed?
My package generates 3 font types, ttf, otf and type1, from the same
source. With the "fonts" convention, 2 of them must be gone.
More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel