[Pkg-fonts-devel] Build-Depends: fontforge-nox | fontforge ?

Christian PERRIER bubulle at debian.org
Wed Feb 2 06:09:02 UTC 2011

Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (dkg at fifthhorseman.net):

> I also think this is a good idea, and will try to address it when i
> bring ttf-fifthhorseman-dkg-handwriting into compliance with the latest
> fonts policy.  But i think the build-dep should be 'fontforge-nox |
> fontforge', and not the other way around.  won't the buildds
> preferentially satisfy disjunctive dependencies in the order listed?

There are high chances that you're right..:-)

BTW, if you think about aligning the font package with the (yet to be
written) font policy, then you might want to rename it to

I think we should do our best to have this package renaming transition
happening during squeeze->wheezy.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20110202/0987b5e0/attachment-0001.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list