[Pkg-fonts-devel] Lintian error with new font package name convention

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (dkg at fifthhorseman.net):

> I don't think this needs to go any formal DEP-style route if there is no
> controversy on the pkg-fonts-devel team.  Let's just write up the
> consensus on the wiki and move forward.


Added to my TODO pile....but, really, I would welcome another
pkg-fonts team member to propose such draft policy.:)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20110210/894fcccb/attachment.pgp>