[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#551955: ttf-anonymous-pro: changing back from ITP to RFP

Christian PERRIER bubulle at debian.org
Sun Feb 20 14:00:02 UTC 2011

Quoting Rogério Brito (rbrito at ime.usp.br):

> No, no. It has seen activity. :-)
> The packages are ready. I am just waiting for a sponsor, after having asked
> for reviews (and even posted about fonts that I had packaged for some time
> already).  Some links that I can cite immediately:
> * http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog/posts/packaging-fonts-for-a-debian-based-system/
> * https://launchpad.net/~rbrito/+archive/ppa/+packages
> * http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rbrito-guest/ttf-anonymous-pro.git
> * http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2010-November/005757.html
> * http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/font-anonymous-pro/font-anonymous-pro_1.002-1.dsc
> Yes, I should have updated the bug reports, but I just expected to have them
> uploaded (or at least, have feedback) in, say, 15 days after I posted,
> instead of half a year.
> If you can sponsor those, I would appreciate. :-)

I probably missed the sponsor request (please note that I don't follow
-mentors...I expect RFS requests to show in pkg-fonts-devel....).

Still, we finally settled for fontS-<foundry>-<fontname> for the
packages' namles. Could you rename that package?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20110220/5614c5ad/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list