[Pkg-fonts-devel] "foundry" part is ? (Re: Font packages renaming mini-HOWTO?)

Hideki Yamane henrich at debian.or.jp
Sun Jun 19 03:57:43 UTC 2011

Hi all,

On Thu, 5 May 2011 06:28:43 +0200
Christian PERRIER <bubulle at debian.org> wrote:
> This is good as I think we reached some kind of consensus with last
> proposals, assuming the "foundry" part is considered to be optional.

 Any conclusion?
  a. to be optional
  b. should not be present at all unless there are multiple packages with the same name
  c. other


 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list