[Pkg-fonts-devel] "foundry" part is ? (Re: Font packages renaming mini-HOWTO?)

Paul Wise pabs at debian.org
Sun Jun 19 05:28:01 UTC 2011

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Hideki Yamane <henrich at debian.or.jp> wrote:

>  Any conclusion?

My vote in decreasing order of preference:

>  b. should not be present at all unless there are multiple packages with the same name
>  a. to be optional



More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list