[Pkg-fonts-devel] Font packages renaming mini-HOWTO?

[Christian PERRIER]

Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (dkg at fifthhorseman.net):

> So *my* innate conservatism says: "why should fonts be any different?"
> We should keep the package naming conventions simple and consistent with
> the rest of the archive.


Well, you guys start connvincing me..:-)...sorry for folks who already
renamed packages such as Ahmed or Hideki.

Let's wait for other arguments (I mean arguments for other people than
dkg or pabs..:-))

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20110507/7d9c7d6d/attachment.pgp>