[Pkg-fonts-devel] Package naming preference for non-ttf formats (eg. PSF)

Paul Sladen pkg-fonts at paul.sladen.org
Fri Nov 25 00:43:34 UTC 2011


On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using
> fonts-[foundry]-fontname-console.

I've uploaded a bump of 'ubuntu-font-family-sources' Source with the
console-font building code uncommented[0][1]:

  $ dpkg -L fonts-ubuntu-font-family-console  | grep psf
  /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-R-8x16.psf
  /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-BI-8x16.psf
  /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-B-8x16.psf
  /usr/share/consolefonts/UbuntuMono-RI-8x16.psf

This second binary is in addition to the current main
'ttf-ubuntu-font-family' binary.  I would be grateful for advice about
what would be the best name for a renamed main binary package.

	-Paul

[0] Had been waiting on the promoting bitmap handling utilities 
    'otf2bdf' and 'bdf2psf' to Ubuntu 'main'.

[1] A separate package (<20 kB) so that server/embedded systems are
    not dependent upon shipping many megabytes of vector fonts.




More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list