[Pkg-fonts-devel] fontforge packaging in git: caveats, instructions, good news, and next steps
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Tue Mar 13 15:58:52 UTC 2012
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:34:02 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> On 03/11/2012 01:27 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > * Upload to unstable or experimental?
> I've just used the git packaging of the upstream version to build a new
> version of my handwriting font. It seems to work fine. I'd like to
> upload it to the archive for wider testing, but i'd be happy to wait if
> other folks want to build it and try it out locally first, or try to
> resolve any of the caveats i mentioned.
> What do you think? should i upload? if so, to which archive (unstable
> or experimental)?
Sorry to keep on replying to myself within this thread; if i hear no
objections in a couple days (or if i hear active encouragement from
other members of the team earlier), i plan to upload the new version of
fontforge (built from the git sources mentioned in this thread) to
Please try it out and speak up before then!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 965 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel