[Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging Noto fonts

Vasudev Kamath kamathvasudev at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 17:13:36 UTC 2013

On 08:08 Fri 28 Jun     , Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Vasudev Kamath (kamathvasudev at gmail.com):
> > > Anyway, is there a reason for debian/compat to not be 9, by the way?
> > 
> > No reasons. If I bump compat to 9 CDBS will generate debhelper
> > dependency on >=9 other than that nothing.
> My personal stance on this is "use the dh compatibility level that is
> supported in stable". The main rationale is that, doing this way,
> utilities do behave as "modernly" as possible....without /me to care..:-)

Done! Sorry for delay please let me know if any further change is

Vasudev Kamath
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20130806/ddc74316/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list