[Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging Noto fonts

Vasudev Kamath kamathvasudev at gmail.com
Sun Aug 11 17:22:47 UTC 2013

Hi Denis,

On 08:04 Wed 07 Aug     , Denis Jacquerye wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Vasudev Kamath <kamathvasudev at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Done! Sorry for delay please let me know if any further change is
> > required.
> >
> Hi.
> The unhinted fonts that don’t have a hinted equivalent are required.

I think they probably should go as part of other package as upstream
provides them as separate tarball. But I'm not sure. Can't we wait till
upstream release hinted equivalaent for the same?

I'm open for suggestions.

Vasudev Kamath
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/attachments/20130811/716d65ff/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list